
Ours is a steak dinner with baked potatoes on Christmas Eve.
“If you ask me what I came to do in this world, I, an artist, I will answer you: I am here to live out loud.” Emile Zola
Frülings Erwachen
Wedekind’s masterful play, written ca. 1889, comes jaunting to the stage at the Berliner Ensemble with a cast of talented Shauspieler and a simple and poigniant design that pleases both the senses and the intellect at every turn.
My familiarity with Frank Wedekind’s Spring Awakening began with the Broadway production of the same name that came to the into the NYC spotlight after an impressive run at the off-Broadway Atlantic Theater Company. When I first saw this production—with music by pop star Duncan Sheik and book (adaptation) by Stephen Sater—it was an impressive new genre of musical for commercial theater with a cast of energetic, sexy, potential superstar young actors with voices that took Sheik’s music to the next level. All this changed when the producers realized how much money they could make by simplifying and “Disney-fying” this revolutionary new musical. The resulting production—which I also witnessed—lost not only its charm and depth, but it’s integrity.
The story of this handful of ill-informed German school students and their stifling Puritanical elders is all to familiar to every American theater-goer and twelve year old girl, but this is truly a story—a piece of literature—that everyone who hits puberty should read.
Wendla Bergmann is just turning thirteen and resists her mother’s attempt to put her in a longer, blacker, more conservative (ie “grownup”) dress. To her mother’s dismay, she is allowed to keep her kurz, weiß (short, white) dress for another spring season—a decision that will ultimately lead the play to its tragic turn. Melchior Gabor obviously has an infatuation with Wendla—this does not go unnoticed by the young girl and her giggling friends—although mingling of boys and girls is frowned upon at this dangerous age. Despite the fact that the children once played together, the awakening of their “urges” makes contact taboo. Melchior has an amusing scene as he helps his troubled friend Moritz Stiefel understand the joys of self pleasure and tries to explain that it is normal to have “phantoms” of the fairer sex. As Mortiz’s thoughts distract him from school and he is kicked out of the academy, Melchior and Wendla’s romance intensifies as they begin to meet behind their parents disapproving backs. Wendla’s mother has a hilarious time trying to explain where babies come from to her curious daughter—ultimately landing with “a man and a woman must love each other very much.” With this answer in mind, Wendla thinks nothing of Melchior’s rape because he vows that he does not love her. Meanwhile, Moritz decides it is better to take his own life. His childhood friend Ilsa catches him in the act and tries to persuade him otherwise by sharing about her newfound personal and sexual freedom. But the constraints of his society get the best of him, and he ends his life as we end act one. His funeral is a decisive moment for the audience in seeing the dynamic between young person and authority, but provides no real resolve for the characters: the surviving boys stand confused and alone while their elders mock the death of their strange friend and leave with a cackling, sickening laugh. Melchior has his own trouble when his teachers discover his “anatomical” drawings, and he is sent to a reformatory school in Britain. Wendla comes down with stomach pains and her mother painfully confronts her with the truth of the situation: “You have a child!” The play comes to a close as Melchior discovers Wendla’s grave in the cemetery. Then the play takes a strange turn. Mortiz, along with the philosophical person of (perhaps) Wedekind himself appear to Melchior in the graveyard and take the momentum out of what is otherwise an intensely tragic and climactic ending.
Most of the adults are played in a style that presents them as goofy, antiquated, and clown-like aliens. They appear much less frequently than their children, but it is quite evident that the stifling of knowledge to youngsters produces correspondingly stifled adults. All stars from the old folk include Ms. Gabor’s tedious but emotional four-page letter to Moritz that ends with a simple sigh and the Headmaster’s challenged assistant—overworked and underdressed (his vest popped open as he sauntered around the stage opening and closing windows)—who almost feels remorse when Melchior is caught trying to “artistically” understand his own physiology.
The design for this struggle between the generations generally stays out of the crossfire here. Sounds were limited to wind, rain, thunder, and birds—essential sound to any spring. No music was even needed to accentuate the incredible noise made by the depth of the ensemble’s characters. The costumes—all in black and white until Ilsa’s entrance in prostitute pink—emphasized the children’s physical development by showing their stretching seams and shortening sleeves. The set was brilliantly simple and effective. It consisted almost exclusively of four electronic rotating flats—white on one side and black on the other—that became a character in and of themselves—whether twisting wildly in the spring wind or turning slowly and dauntingly just before Moritz’s suicide scene—until they grandly fell to the floor to create the uneven landscape of the cemetery. Lighting was as simple and as blunt as Wedekind’s language. Blue-white tints and light rose hints bounced off the bright white surfaces of the set and gaunt pale faces of the actors.
Ultimately my reaction to this piece was similar to that of my reaction to the musical version in the states. I left invigorated by the compelling story and inspired (if not a bit jealous) by the energetic performances of young actors who are obviously doing what they love on the stage while also sharing a story of love, misunderstanding, tragedy, loss, and—mostly, of growing up.